CVE-2010-4535
Description
The password reset functionality in django.contrib.auth in Django before 1.1.3, 1.2.x before 1.2.4, and 1.3.x before 1.3 beta 1 does not validate the length of a string representing a base36 timestamp, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a URL that specifies a large base36 integer.
Predictions
Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.
Mitigations
Vendor advisory: debian — https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4535
Vendor advisory: secalert@redhat.com — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665373
Vendor advisory: secalert@redhat.com — http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/03/5
Vendor advisory: secalert@redhat.com — http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/4
Vendor advisory: secalert@redhat.com — http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2010/dec/22/security/
Vendor advisory: secalert@redhat.com — http://secunia.com/advisories/42715
Vendor advisory: secalert@redhat.com — http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/15032
OS impact
| OS | Version | Status | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | bookworm | fixed | 1.2.4-1 |
| debian | bullseye | fixed | 1.2.4-1 |
| debian | forky | fixed | 1.2.4-1 |
| debian | sid | fixed | 1.2.4-1 |
| debian | trixie | fixed | 1.2.4-1 |
Application impact
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| djangoproject | django | {"endIncluding":"1.1.2"} | |
| djangoproject | django | 0.91 | |
| djangoproject | django | 0.95 | |
| djangoproject | django | 0.95.1 | |
| djangoproject | django | 0.96 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.0 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.0.1 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.0.2 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.1 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.1.0 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.2 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.2.1 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.2.2 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.2.3 | |
| djangoproject | django | 1.3 | |
References
- http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/15032
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-January/053041.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-January/053072.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42715
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42827
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42913
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2010/dec/22/security/
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/03/5
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45563
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1040-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0048
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0098
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665373
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4535
- https://github.com/django/django/commit/7f8dd9cbac074389af8d8fd235bf2cb657227b9a
- https://github.com/django/django/commit/d5d8942a160685c403d381a279e72e09de5489a9
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7wph-fc4w-wqp2
- https://github.com/django/django
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/django/PYSEC-2011-29.yaml
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/django/PYSEC-2011-9.yaml
- https://web.archive.org/web/20200228193349/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45563
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2010/dec/22/security
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4535
CWEs
CWE-20
Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.