CVE-2012-2322

medium
Published 2012-05-18 ยท Modified 2026-04-29
CVSS v3
โ€”
CVSS v4 NEW
โ€”
not yet in upstream
VIR risk
5.0

Description

Integer overflow in the dhcpv6_get_option function in gdhcp/client.c in ConnMan before 0.85 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and crash) via an invalid length value in a DHCP packet.

Predictions

Exploit likelihood
20%
Patch ETA
โ€”

Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.

Mitigations

No mitigations published for this CVE yet.

The vendor-content worker queues fetches as references arrive (check back in a few minutes). Or โ€” if you've already worked around this in production โ€” publish your fix to the community-verified tier.

โœš Propose a mitigation on Community โ†’ Mitigations published via the community go through AI scoring + 2 human reviewers + 7-day silent objection window before landing here with source_tier=community-verified.

OS impact

OSVersionStatusFixed in
debian debianbookwormfixed1.0-1
debian debianbullseyefixed1.0-1
debian debianforkyfixed1.0-1
debian debiansidfixed1.0-1
debian debiantrixiefixed1.0-1

Application impact

VendorProductVersionsFixed
connmanconnman{"endIncluding":"0.84"}
connmanconnman0.1
connmanconnman0.2
connmanconnman0.3
connmanconnman0.4
connmanconnman0.5
connmanconnman0.6
connmanconnman0.7
connmanconnman0.8
connmanconnman0.9
connmanconnman0.10
connmanconnman0.11
connmanconnman0.12
connmanconnman0.13
connmanconnman0.14
connmanconnman0.15
connmanconnman0.16
connmanconnman0.17
connmanconnman0.18
connmanconnman0.19
connmanconnman0.20
connmanconnman0.21
connmanconnman0.22
connmanconnman0.23
connmanconnman0.24
connmanconnman0.25
connmanconnman0.26
connmanconnman0.27
connmanconnman0.28
connmanconnman0.29
connmanconnman0.30
connmanconnman0.31
connmanconnman0.32
connmanconnman0.33
connmanconnman0.34
connmanconnman0.35
connmanconnman0.36
connmanconnman0.37
connmanconnman0.38
connmanconnman0.39
connmanconnman0.40
connmanconnman0.41
connmanconnman0.42
connmanconnman0.43
connmanconnman0.44
connmanconnman0.45
connmanconnman0.46
connmanconnman0.47
connmanconnman0.48
connmanconnman0.49
connmanconnman0.50
connmanconnman0.51
connmanconnman0.52
connmanconnman0.53
connmanconnman0.54
connmanconnman0.55
connmanconnman0.56
connmanconnman0.57
connmanconnman0.58
connmanconnman0.59
connmanconnman0.60
connmanconnman0.61
connmanconnman0.62
connmanconnman0.63
connmanconnman0.64
connmanconnman0.65
connmanconnman0.66
connmanconnman0.67
connmanconnman0.68
connmanconnman0.69
connmanconnman0.70
connmanconnman0.71
connmanconnman0.72
connmanconnman0.73
connmanconnman0.74
connmanconnman0.75
connmanconnman0.76
connmanconnman0.77
connmanconnman0.78
connmanconnman0.79
connmanconnman0.80
connmanconnman0.81
connmanconnman0.82
connmanconnman0.83

References

CWEs

CWE-189

Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.

Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.