VIR Vulnerability Intelligence Relay

CVE-2013-2054

medium
Published 2013-07-09 · Modified 2026-04-29
💬 Discuss on Community ✚ Propose mitigation
CVSS v3
—
CVSS v4 NEW
—
not yet in upstream
VIR risk
5.1

Description

Buffer overflow in the atodn function in strongSwan 2.0.0 through 4.3.4, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054.

Predictions

Exploit likelihood
20%
Patch ETA
—

Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.

Mitigations

No mitigations published for this CVE yet.

The vendor-content worker queues fetches as references arrive (check back in a few minutes). Or — if you've already worked around this in production — publish your fix to the community-verified tier.

✚ Propose a mitigation on Community → Mitigations published via the community go through AI scoring + 2 human reviewers + 7-day silent objection window before landing here with source_tier=community-verified.

OS impact
OSVersionStatusFixed in
debian debianbookwormfixed4.3.4-1
debian debianbullseyefixed4.3.4-1
debian debianforkyfixed4.3.4-1
debian debiansidfixed4.3.4-1
debian debiantrixiefixed4.3.4-1

Application impact
VendorProductVersionsFixed
strongswanstrongswan2.0.0
strongswanstrongswan2.0.1
strongswanstrongswan2.0.2
strongswanstrongswan2.1.0
strongswanstrongswan2.1.1
strongswanstrongswan2.1.2
strongswanstrongswan2.1.3
strongswanstrongswan2.1.4
strongswanstrongswan2.1.5
strongswanstrongswan2.3.0
strongswanstrongswan2.3.1
strongswanstrongswan2.3.2
strongswanstrongswan2.4
strongswanstrongswan2.4.0
strongswanstrongswan2.4.0a
strongswanstrongswan2.4.1
strongswanstrongswan2.4.2
strongswanstrongswan2.4.3
strongswanstrongswan2.4.4
strongswanstrongswan2.5.0
strongswanstrongswan2.5.1
strongswanstrongswan2.5.2
strongswanstrongswan2.5.3
strongswanstrongswan2.5.4
strongswanstrongswan2.5.5
strongswanstrongswan2.5.6
strongswanstrongswan2.5.7
strongswanstrongswan2.6
strongswanstrongswan2.6.0
strongswanstrongswan2.6.1
strongswanstrongswan2.6.2
strongswanstrongswan2.6.3
strongswanstrongswan2.6.4
strongswanstrongswan2.6.14
strongswanstrongswan2.6.16
strongswanstrongswan2.6.20
strongswanstrongswan2.6.21
strongswanstrongswan2.7.0
strongswanstrongswan2.7.1
strongswanstrongswan2.7.2
strongswanstrongswan2.7.3
strongswanstrongswan2.8.0
strongswanstrongswan2.8.1
strongswanstrongswan2.8.2
strongswanstrongswan2.8.3
strongswanstrongswan2.8.4
strongswanstrongswan2.8.5
strongswanstrongswan2.8.6
strongswanstrongswan2.8.7
strongswanstrongswan2.8.8
strongswanstrongswan2.8.9
strongswanstrongswan2.8.10
strongswanstrongswan2.8.11
strongswanstrongswan4.0.0
strongswanstrongswan4.0.1
strongswanstrongswan4.0.2
strongswanstrongswan4.0.3
strongswanstrongswan4.0.4
strongswanstrongswan4.0.5
strongswanstrongswan4.0.6
strongswanstrongswan4.0.7
strongswanstrongswan4.1
strongswanstrongswan4.1.0
strongswanstrongswan4.1.1
strongswanstrongswan4.1.2
strongswanstrongswan4.1.3
strongswanstrongswan4.1.4
strongswanstrongswan4.1.5
strongswanstrongswan4.1.6
strongswanstrongswan4.1.7
strongswanstrongswan4.1.8
strongswanstrongswan4.1.9
strongswanstrongswan4.1.10
strongswanstrongswan4.1.11
strongswanstrongswan4.2.0
strongswanstrongswan4.2.1
strongswanstrongswan4.2.2
strongswanstrongswan4.2.3
strongswanstrongswan4.2.4
strongswanstrongswan4.2.5
strongswanstrongswan4.2.6
strongswanstrongswan4.2.7
strongswanstrongswan4.2.8
strongswanstrongswan4.2.9
strongswanstrongswan4.2.10
strongswanstrongswan4.2.11
strongswanstrongswan4.2.12
strongswanstrongswan4.2.13
strongswanstrongswan4.2.14
strongswanstrongswan4.2.15
strongswanstrongswan4.2.16
strongswanstrongswan4.3.0
strongswanstrongswan4.3.1
strongswanstrongswan4.3.2
strongswanstrongswan4.3.3
strongswanstrongswan4.3.4

References

CWEs

CWE-119

Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.

Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.