CVE-2014-3570
Description
The BN_sqr implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k does not properly calculate the square of a BIGNUM value, which might make it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors, related to crypto/bn/asm/mips.pl, crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c, and crypto/bn/bn_asm.c.
Predictions
Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.
Mitigations
No mitigations published for this CVE yet.
The vendor-content worker queues fetches as references arrive (check back in a few minutes). Or — if you've already worked around this in production — publish your fix to the community-verified tier.
✚ Propose a mitigation on Community → Mitigations published via the community go through AI scoring + 2 human reviewers + 7-day silent objection window before landing here withsource_tier=community-verified.
OS impact
| OS | Version | Status | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | bookworm | fixed | 1.0.1k-1 |
| debian | bullseye | fixed | 1.0.1k-1 |
| debian | forky | fixed | 1.0.1k-1 |
| debian | sid | fixed | 1.0.1k-1 |
| debian | trixie | fixed | 1.0.1k-1 |
Application impact
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | {"endIncluding":"0.9.8zc"} | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0a | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0b | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0c | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0d | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0e | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0f | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0g | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0h | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0i | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0j | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0k | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0l | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0m | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0n | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.0o | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1a | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1b | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1c | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1d | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1e | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1f | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1g | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1h | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1i | |
| openssl | openssl | 1.0.1j | |
References
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10679
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/147938.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148363.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00026.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00037.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142496179803395&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142496289803847&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142720981827617&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142721102728110&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142895206924048&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050205101530&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050254401665&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050297101809&w=2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0066.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html
- http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150310-ssl
- http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3125
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:019
CWEs
CWE-310
Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.
Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.