CVE-2026-43299

medium
Published 2026-05-08 ยท Modified 2026-05-15
CVSS v3
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS v4 NEW
โ€”
not yet in upstream
VIR risk
5.5

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not ASSERT() when the fs flips RO inside btrfs_repair_io_failure() [BUG] There is a bug report that when btrfs hits ENOSPC error in a critical path, btrfs flips RO (this part is expected, although the ENOSPC bug still needs to be addressed). The problem is after the RO flip, if there is a read repair pending, we can hit the ASSERT() inside btrfs_repair_io_failure() like the following: BTRFS info (device vdc): relocating block group 30408704 flags metadata|raid1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) WARNING: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3235 at __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0x453/0xfd0, CPU#1: btrfs/383844 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass [...] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS info (device vdc state EA): 2 enospc errors during balance BTRFS info (device vdc state EA): balance: ended with status: -30 BTRFS error (device vdc state EA): parent transid verify failed on logical 30556160 mirror 2 wanted 8 found 6 BTRFS error (device vdc state EA): bdev /dev/nvme0n1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 10, gen 0 [...] assertion failed: !(fs_info->sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY) :: 0, in fs/btrfs/bio.c:938 ------------[ cut here ]------------ assertion failed: !(fs_info->sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY) :: 0, in fs/btrfs/bio.c:938 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/bio.c:938! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 868 Comm: kworker/u8:13 Tainted: G W N 6.19.0-rc6+ #4788 PREEMPT(full) Tainted: [W]=WARN, [N]=TEST Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.17.0-0-gb52ca86e094d-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: btrfs-endio simple_end_io_work RIP: 0010:btrfs_repair_io_failure.cold+0xb2/0x120 RSP: 0000:ffffc90001d2bcf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000051 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8305cf42 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 00000000fffeffff R09: ffffffff837fa988 R10: ffffffff8327a9e0 R11: 6f69747265737361 R12: ffff88813018d310 R13: ffff888168b8a000 R14: ffffc90001d2bd90 R15: ffff88810a169000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8885e752c000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 ------------[ cut here ]------------ [CAUSE] The cause of -ENOSPC error during the test case btrfs/124 is still unknown, although it's known that we still have cases where metadata can be over-committed but can not be fulfilled correctly, thus if we hit such ENOSPC error inside a critical path, we have no choice but abort the current transaction. This will mark the fs read-only. The problem is inside the btrfs_repair_io_failure() path that we require the fs not to be mount read-only. This is normally fine, but if we are doing a read-repair meanwhile the fs flips RO due to a critical error, we can enter btrfs_repair_io_failure() with super block set to read-only, thus triggering the above crash. [FIX] Just replace the ASSERT() with a proper return if the fs is already read-only.

Predictions

Exploit likelihood
55%
Patch ETA
โ€”

Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.

Mitigations

Mitigation details

Source: Microsoft Security Response Center ยท View original โ†— ยท proprietary-no-redistribution
Full prose not cached โ€” VIR stores only structured fields (affected/fixed versions, references) for this source. Click "View original" above for the vendor's full advisory.

Affected

VendorProductVersion
microsoftWindows Server 2012
microsoftWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
microsoftWindows Server 2012 R2
microsoftWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
microsoftMicrosoft Excel 2016 (32-bit edition)
microsoftMicrosoft Excel 2016 (64-bit edition)
microsoftMicrosoft Word 2016 (32-bit edition)
microsoftMicrosoft Word 2016 (64-bit edition)
microsoftMicrosoft Office 2016 (32-bit edition)
microsoftMicrosoft Office 2016 (64-bit edition)
microsoftWindows Server 2016
microsoftOffice Online Server
microsoftWindows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems
microsoftWindows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems
microsoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
microsoftMicrosoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016
microsoftMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 for x64-based Systems (GDR)
microsoftWindows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems
microsoftWindows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems
microsoftWindows Server 2019
microsoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
microsoftMicrosoft Office 2019 for 32-bit editions
microsoftMicrosoft Office 2019 for 64-bit editions
microsoftMicrosoft SharePoint Server 2019
microsoftVisual Studio Code
microsoftWindows Admin Center
microsoftMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012
microsoftMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2
microsoftMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016
microsoftMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems

OS impact

OSVersionStatusFixed in
suse slesaffected
debian debianbookwormaffected
debian debianbullseyeaffected
debian debianforkyfixed6.19.6-1
debian debiansidfixed6.19.6-1
debian debiantrixieaffected
linux linux-kernelaffected6.19.6
windows windowsaffected

References

Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.

Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.