CVEs from 2020
Total
4,157
critical
critical 193
high
high 471
medium
medium 674
low
low 57
% Critical
4.6%
% with KEV
3.5%
% with exploit
3.6%
Top products
- banking_digital_experience 30
- retail_xstore_point_of_service 28
- primavera_unifier 27
- retail_service_backbone 15
- financial_services_institutional_performance_analytics 10
- communications_network_charging_and_control 10
- communications_contacts_server 9
- agile_plm 8
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Risk | Published | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-11112 | high | 8.8 | 8.8 | 6y ago | jackson-databind mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing | |
| CVE-2020-37221 | high | 8.4 | 8.4 | 15d ago | Atomic Alarm Clock 6.3 contains a stack overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code by supplying a malicious string to the display name textbox in the Time Zones Cloc… | |
| CVE-2020-37244 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 12d ago | Supsystic Membership 1.4.7 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the 'search' and 'sidx' p… | |
| CVE-2020-37243 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 12d ago | Supsystic Pricing Table 1.8.7 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the 'sidx' GET parameter that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries through the getListForTbl acti… | |
| CVE-2020-37242 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 12d ago | Supsystic Ultimate Maps 1.1.12 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the 'sidx' GET parame… | |
| CVE-2020-37218 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 15d ago | Joomla com_hdwplayer 4.2 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the search.php file that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the … | |
| CVE-2020-37004 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 4mo ago | The Ultimate Project Manager CRM PRO version 2.0.5 contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to extract usernames and password hashes from the tbl_users database table. Attac… | |
| CVE-2020-36183 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Unsafe Deserialization in jackson-databind | |
| CVE-2020-35728 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Serialization gadget exploit in jackson-databind | |
| CVE-2020-14060 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Deserialization of untrusted data in Jackson Databind | |
| CVE-2020-14062 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Deserialization of untrusted data in Jackson Databind | |
| CVE-2020-11619 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | jackson-databind mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing | |
| CVE-2020-16150 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A Lucky 13 timing side channel in mbedtls_ssl_decrypt_buf in library/ssl_msg.c in Trusted Firmware Mbed TLS through 2.23.0 allows an attacker to recover secret key information. This affects CBC mode … | |
| CVE-2020-28011 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Heap-based Buffer Overflow in queue_run via two sender options: -R and -S. This may cause privilege escalation from exim to root. | |
| CVE-2020-28010 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Out-of-bounds Write because the main function, while setuid root, copies the current working directory pathname into a buffer that is too small (on some common platforms). | |
| CVE-2020-6467 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-3123 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A vulnerability in the Data-Loss-Prevention (DLP) module in Clam AntiVirus (ClamAV) Software versions 0.102.1 and 0.102.0 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service … | |
| CVE-2020-28025 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Out-of-bounds Read because pdkim_finish_bodyhash does not validate the relationship between sig->bodyhash.len and b->bh.len; thus, a crafted DKIM-Signature header might le… | |
| CVE-2020-6474 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-28024 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Buffer Underwrite that may result in unauthenticated remote attackers executing arbitrary commands, because smtp_ungetc was only intended to push back characters, but can … | |
| CVE-2020-16033 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-13114 | high | — | 8.0 | — | An issue was discovered in libexif before 0.6.22. An unrestricted size in handling Canon EXIF MakerNote data could lead to consumption of large amounts of compute time for decoding EXIF data. | |
| CVE-2020-0548 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Cleanup errors in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |
| CVE-2020-5260 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Affected versions of Git have a vulnerability whereby Git can be tricked into sending private credentials to a host controlled by an attacker. Git uses external "credential helper" programs to store … | |
| CVE-2020-12409 | high | — | 8.0 | — | When using certain blank characters in a URL, they where incorrectly rendered as spaces instead of an encoded URL. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 77. | |
| CVE-2020-13112 | high | — | 8.0 | — | An issue was discovered in libexif before 0.6.22. Several buffer over-reads in EXIF MakerNote handling could lead to information disclosure and crashes. This is different from CVE-2020-0093. | |
| CVE-2020-4032 | high | — | 8.0 | — | In FreeRDP before version 2.1.2, there is an integer casting vulnerability in update_recv_secondary_order. All clients with +glyph-cache /relax-order-checks are affected. This is fixed in version 2.1… | |
| CVE-2020-25681 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way RRSets are sorted before validating with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who can forge… | |
| CVE-2020-13113 | high | — | 8.0 | — | An issue was discovered in libexif before 0.6.22. Use of uninitialized memory in EXIF Makernote handling could lead to crashes and potential use-after-free conditions. | |
| CVE-2020-13904 | high | — | 8.0 | — | FFmpeg 2.8 and 4.2.3 has a use-after-free via a crafted EXTINF duration in an m3u8 file because parse_playlist in libavformat/hls.c frees a pointer, and later that pointer is accessed in av_probe_inp… | |
| CVE-2020-6463 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Use after free in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 81.0.4044.122 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |
| CVE-2020-15673 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Mozilla developers reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 80 and Firefox ESR 78.2. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these… | |
| CVE-2020-8177 | high | — | 8.0 | — | curl 7.20.0 through 7.70.0 is vulnerable to improper restriction of names for files and other resources that can lead too overwriting a local file when the -J flag is used. | |
| CVE-2020-8695 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Observable discrepancy in the RAPL interface for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |
| CVE-2020-8698 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |
| CVE-2020-12410 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Mozilla developers reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 76 and Firefox ESR 68.8. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these… | |
| CVE-2020-8617 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the se… | |
| CVE-2020-35111 | high | — | 8.0 | — | When an extension with the proxy permission registered to receive <all_urls>, the proxy.onRequest callback was not triggered for view-source URLs. While web content cannot navigate to such URLs, a us… | |
| CVE-2020-15659 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Mozilla developers and community members reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 78 and Firefox ESR 78.0. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enoug… | |
| CVE-2020-10745 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A flaw was found in all Samba versions before 4.10.17, before 4.11.11 and before 4.12.4 in the way it processed NetBios over TCP/IP. This flaw allows a remote attacker could to cause the Samba server… | |
| CVE-2020-26973 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Certain input to the CSS Sanitizer confused it, resulting in incorrect components being removed. This could have been used as a sanitizer bypass. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 84, Thunderbird … | |
| CVE-2020-26974 | high | — | 8.0 | — | When flex-basis was used on a table wrapper, a StyleGenericFlexBasis object could have been incorrectly cast to the wrong type. This resulted in a heap user-after-free, memory corruption, and a poten… | |
| CVE-2020-10957 | high | — | 8.0 | — | In Dovecot before 2.3.10.1, unauthenticated sending of malformed parameters to a NOOP command causes a NULL Pointer Dereference and crash in submission-login, submission, or lmtp. | |
| CVE-2020-1723 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in keycloak | |
| CVE-2020-15889 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Lua 5.4.0 has a getobjname heap-based buffer over-read because youngcollection in lgc.c uses markold for an insufficient number of list members. | |
| CVE-2020-35680 | high | — | 8.0 | — | smtpd/lka_filter.c in OpenSMTPD before 6.8.0p1, in certain configurations, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a crafted pattern of cl… | |
| CVE-2020-35702 | high | — | 8.0 | — | DCTStream::getChars in DCTStream.cc in Poppler 20.12.1 has a heap-based buffer overflow via a crafted PDF document. NOTE: later reports indicate that this only affects builds from Poppler git clones … | |
| CVE-2020-15961 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6490 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6483 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6481 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6468 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6573 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6496 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6493 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6509 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6491 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6489 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6488 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6487 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6486 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6484 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6485 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6475 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6480 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6471 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6469 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6476 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6444 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6440 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6437 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6470 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6462 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6448 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6465 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6831 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6461 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6447 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6445 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6464 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6459 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6446 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6460 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6456 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6439 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6442 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6438 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6436 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6425 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6435 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6433 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6432 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6431 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6430 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6452 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6428 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6407 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6450 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6429 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6422 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium |