CVEs from 2020
Total
4,160
critical
critical 193
high
high 470
medium
medium 675
low
low 56
% Critical
4.6%
% with KEV
3.5%
% with exploit
3.6%
Top products
- banking_digital_experience 30
- retail_xstore_point_of_service 28
- primavera_unifier 27
- retail_service_backbone 15
- financial_services_institutional_performance_analytics 10
- communications_network_charging_and_control 10
- communications_contacts_server 9
- agile_plm 8
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Risk | Published | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-35701 | high | — | 8.0 | — | An issue was discovered in Cacti 1.2.x through 1.2.16. A SQL injection vulnerability in data_debug.php allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the site_id paramete… | |
| CVE-2020-26970 | high | — | 8.0 | — | When reading SMTP server status codes, Thunderbird writes an integer value to a position on the stack that is intended to contain just one byte. Depending on processor architecture and stack layout, … | |
| CVE-2020-12663 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Unbound before 1.10.1 has an infinite loop via malformed DNS answers received from upstream servers. | |
| CVE-2020-12662 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Unbound before 1.10.1 has Insufficient Control of Network Message Volume, aka an "NXNSAttack" issue. This is triggered by random subdomains in the NSDNAME in NS records. | |
| CVE-2020-28018 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Use After Free in smtp_reset in certain situations that may be common for builds with OpenSSL. | |
| CVE-2020-27780 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A flaw was found in Linux-Pam in versions prior to 1.5.1 in the way it handle empty passwords for non-existing users. When the user doesn't exist PAM try to authenticate with root and in the case of … | |
| CVE-2020-15676 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Firefox sometimes ran the onload handler for SVG elements that the DOM sanitizer decided to remove, resulting in JavaScript being executed after pasting attacker-controlled data into a contenteditabl… | |
| CVE-2020-6478 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16033 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-25682 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A flaw was found in dnsmasq before 2.83. A buffer overflow vulnerability was discovered in the way dnsmasq extract names from DNS packets before validating them with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the n… | |
| CVE-2020-8616 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause … | |
| CVE-2020-10188 | high | — | 8.0 | — | utility.c in telnetd in netkit telnet through 0.17 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via short writes or urgent data, because of a buffer overflow involving the netclear and nextitem … | |
| CVE-2020-24513 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Important: microcode_ctl security, bug fix and enhancement update | |
| CVE-2020-24489 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Important: microcode_ctl security, bug fix and enhancement update | |
| CVE-2020-0549 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Cleanup errors in some data cache evictions for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |
| CVE-2020-25683 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. A remote attacker, who… | |
| CVE-2020-25681 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way RRSets are sorted before validating with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who can forge… | |
| CVE-2020-8169 | high | — | 8.0 | — | curl 7.62.0 through 7.70.0 is vulnerable to an information disclosure vulnerability that can lead to a partial password being leaked over the network and to the DNS server(s). | |
| CVE-2020-4032 | high | — | 8.0 | — | In FreeRDP before version 2.1.2, there is an integer casting vulnerability in update_recv_secondary_order. All clients with +glyph-cache /relax-order-checks are affected. This is fixed in version 2.1… | |
| CVE-2020-26262 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Coturn is free open source implementation of TURN and STUN Server. Coturn before version 4.5.2 by default does not allow peers to connect and relay packets to loopback addresses in the range of `127.… | |
| CVE-2020-14302 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in keycloak | |
| CVE-2020-35702 | high | — | 8.0 | — | DCTStream::getChars in DCTStream.cc in Poppler 20.12.1 has a heap-based buffer overflow via a crafted PDF document. NOTE: later reports indicate that this only affects builds from Poppler git clones … | |
| CVE-2020-15960 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6575 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6482 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6477 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15995 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16032 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16043 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16028 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16026 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16035 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16042 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16027 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16038 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16036 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16031 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16014 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16037 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16019 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16030 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16025 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16024 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15656 | high | — | 8.0 | — | JIT optimizations involving the Javascript arguments object could confuse later optimizations. This risk was already mitigated by various precautions in the code, resulting in this bug rated at only … | |
| CVE-2020-16021 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16020 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16018 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16012 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16016 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15966 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15963 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15964 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6574 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15961 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6490 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6483 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6481 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6468 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6573 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6496 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6493 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6509 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6491 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6489 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6488 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6487 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6486 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6484 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6485 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6475 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6480 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6471 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6469 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6476 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6444 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6440 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6437 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6470 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6462 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6448 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6465 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6831 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6461 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6447 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6445 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6464 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6459 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6446 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6460 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6456 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6439 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6442 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6438 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6436 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6425 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6435 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6433 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6432 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6431 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6430 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium |