CVEs from 2020
Total
4,634
critical
critical 193
high
high 470
medium
medium 675
low
low 56
% Critical
4.2%
% with KEV
3.2%
% with exploit
3.2%
Top products
- banking_digital_experience 30
- retail_xstore_point_of_service 28
- primavera_unifier 27
- retail_service_backbone 15
- financial_services_institutional_performance_analytics 10
- communications_network_charging_and_control 10
- communications_contacts_server 9
- agile_plm 8
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Risk | Published | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-35730 | high | — | 9.5 | 3y ago | An XSS issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.2.13, 1.3.x before 1.3.16, and 1.4.x before 1.4.10. The attacker can send a plain text e-mail message, with JavaScript in a link reference el… | |
| CVE-2020-6418 | high | — | 9.5 | 5y ago | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16017 | high | — | 9.5 | 6y ago | Google Chrome contains a use-after-free vulnerability that allows a remote attacker, who has compromised the renderer process, to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. | |
| CVE-2020-16013 | high | — | 9.5 | 6y ago | Google Chromium V8 Engine contains an inappropriate implementation vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. This vulnerability could… | |
| CVE-2020-15999 | high | — | 9.5 | 6y ago | Important: freetype security update | |
| CVE-2020-37227 | high | 8.8 | 8.8 | 12d ago | HS Brand Logo Slider 2.1 contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability that allows authenticated users to bypass client-side file extension validation by uploading arbitrary files. Attackers can… | |
| CVE-2020-11113 | high | 8.8 | 8.8 | 6y ago | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.openjpa.ee.WASRegistryManagedRuntime (aka openjpa). | |
| CVE-2020-11112 | high | 8.8 | 8.8 | 6y ago | jackson-databind mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing | |
| CVE-2020-37221 | high | 8.4 | 8.4 | 15d ago | Atomic Alarm Clock 6.3 contains a stack overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code by supplying a malicious string to the display name textbox in the Time Zones Cloc… | |
| CVE-2020-37244 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 12d ago | Supsystic Membership 1.4.7 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the 'search' and 'sidx' p… | |
| CVE-2020-37243 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 12d ago | Supsystic Pricing Table 1.8.7 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the 'sidx' GET parameter that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries through the getListForTbl acti… | |
| CVE-2020-37242 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 12d ago | Supsystic Ultimate Maps 1.1.12 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the 'sidx' GET parame… | |
| CVE-2020-37218 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 15d ago | Joomla com_hdwplayer 4.2 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the search.php file that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the … | |
| CVE-2020-37004 | high | 8.2 | 8.2 | 4mo ago | The Ultimate Project Manager CRM PRO version 2.0.5 contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to extract usernames and password hashes from the tbl_users database table. Attac… | |
| CVE-2020-36183 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Unsafe Deserialization in jackson-databind | |
| CVE-2020-35728 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Serialization gadget exploit in jackson-databind | |
| CVE-2020-14060 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Deserialization of untrusted data in Jackson Databind | |
| CVE-2020-14062 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | Deserialization of untrusted data in Jackson Databind | |
| CVE-2020-11619 | high | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6y ago | jackson-databind mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing | |
| CVE-2020-6430 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6407 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-28025 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Out-of-bounds Read because pdkim_finish_bodyhash does not validate the relationship between sig->bodyhash.len and b->bh.len; thus, a crafted DKIM-Signature header might le… | |
| CVE-2020-15960 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-3123 | high | — | 8.0 | — | A vulnerability in the Data-Loss-Prevention (DLP) module in Clam AntiVirus (ClamAV) Software versions 0.102.1 and 0.102.0 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service … | |
| CVE-2020-28009 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow because get_stdinput allows unbounded reads that are accompanied by unbounded increases in a certain size variable. NOTE: exploitation … | |
| CVE-2020-28014 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Execution with Unnecessary Privileges. The -oP option is available to the exim user, and allows a denial of service because root-owned files can be overwritten. | |
| CVE-2020-6433 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15889 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Lua 5.4.0 has a getobjname heap-based buffer over-read because youngcollection in lgc.c uses markold for an insufficient number of list members. | |
| CVE-2020-6432 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6429 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-28008 | high | — | 8.0 | — | Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Execution with Unnecessary Privileges. Because Exim operates as root in the spool directory (owned by a non-root user), an attacker can write to a /var/spool/exim4/input s… | |
| CVE-2020-16012 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6575 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6482 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6477 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6483 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15995 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6431 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6450 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6449 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-35176 | high | — | 8.0 | — | In AWStats through 7.8, cgi-bin/awstats.pl?config= accepts a partial absolute pathname (omitting the initial /etc), even though it was intended to only read a file in the /etc/awstats/awstats.conf fo… | |
| CVE-2020-16038 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16027 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6452 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16042 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16036 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16031 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16014 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16037 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16019 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16030 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16025 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16024 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-35702 | high | — | 8.0 | — | DCTStream::getChars in DCTStream.cc in Poppler 20.12.1 has a heap-based buffer overflow via a crafted PDF document. NOTE: later reports indicate that this only affects builds from Poppler git clones … | |
| CVE-2020-16021 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16020 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16018 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16035 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16016 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15966 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15963 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15964 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6574 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-15961 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6490 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6428 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6481 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6468 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6573 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6427 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16026 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6488 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6489 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-16028 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6422 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6487 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6486 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6484 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6485 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6475 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6480 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6471 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6469 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6476 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6444 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6440 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6437 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6470 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6462 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6448 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6465 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6831 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6461 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6447 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6445 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6464 | high | — | 8.0 | — | arbitrary code execution in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6459 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6446 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6460 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium | |
| CVE-2020-6456 | high | — | 8.0 | — | multiple issues in chromium |